We Challenged Our Page Speed Against 13 Top Web Hosts

 

We are WordPress designers and developers who wanted a web hosting platform optimized for page speed.

We tried many of the other hosts in the early days and decided on creating our own supersonic hosting server based on our knowledge and experience.

Certainly, our results would appear to vindicate that we know how to optimize for page speed.  Read the reviews below.

If you're looking for a fast loading WordPress or Woocommerce driven website you should consider Browserweb . If you have any questions, feel free to ask.

 

 

 

 

Top 8 Hosts Page Speed Review Report (Dec. 2018)

iPage

#8 IPAGE.COM

DECEMBER 2018

4.3s with a page grade C.

Download Desktop Page Speed Report
A2 Hosting

#7  A2HOSTING.COM

DECEMBER 2018

3.4s with a page grade B.

Download Desktop Page Speed Report
Pantheon

#6 PANTHEON.IO

DECEMBER 2018

3.4s with a page grade D.

Download Desktop Page Speed Report
LiquidWeb

#5 LIQUIDWEB.COM

DECEMBER 2018

3.1s with a page grade D.

Download Desktop Page Speed Report
InMotion

#4 INMOTION.COM

DECEMBER 2018

A time of 3.1s with a page grade C.

Download Desktop Page Speed Report
SiteGround

#3 SITEGROUND.COM

DECEMBER 2018

2.0s with a page grade D.

Download Desktop Page Speed Report
DreamHost

#2 DREAMHOST.COM

DECEMBER 2018

1.6s with a page grade B. Best mover and shaker since September, been working hard, albeit it's not a WordPress CMS but a javascript driven website for advanced business solutions.

Download Desktop Page Speed Report
Browserweb

#1 BROWSERWEB

So there you have it, we’ve got faster page speed load times than those 7 other managed WordPress Web Hosting companies.

DECEMBER 2018

1.3s with a page grade A. We use what we sell, WordPress CMS. We're the only host on this list that has an A-Rating and maintains blazing fast page speed on a consistent, month-after-month basis.

We're still No. 1 so we tested more Hosts

WPEngine

#9 WPENGINE.COM

DECEMBER 2018

4.4s with a Grade E. The slow engine is still barely revving over there in Austin, Texas (hat tip).

Download Report
Summary
The end of year has arrived and we've dominated month after month and still remain at the top of the tree.We'll just have to admit, we're #1 and have been since we started recording our results.#SayHello - sign up and enjoy supersonic page speeds with Browserweb and concierge support.

Testimonial

 

 

Top 8 Hosts Page Speed Review Report (Sept. 2018)

We're still No. 1 so we tested more Hosts

 

 

The Original Web Host Review (August 2018)

The New Web Hosts we Tested

 

 

Top Hosts Page Speed Review Report (Archives)

 

 

WP Level II
for The Entreprenuer
$44.95
Month
WP Level III
for The Online Addict
$64.95
Month

 

 

What You Should Look for When Testing Page Speed

 

  • The test location closest to your target audience provides the most accurate representation of your page load.
  • Don’t compare these tools equally and wonder why your scores differ from tool to tool.
  • Onload time may misrepresent the true load time of your page.
  • Real browsers provide a better indication of your website’s performance.
  • It’s important to understand how each tool works before relying on them for any sort of data or results.

 

Which Page Speed Testing tool should you rely upon or use?

It depends. We feel that the use cases for each tool can be broken down into the following categories:

Quick Checks

GTmetrix, Pingdom Tools, and PageSpeed Insights

 

Consistency/Historical Tracking

GTmetrix and WebPagetest

 

In-depth Analysis

GTmetrix and WebPagetest

 

SEO Check

PageSpeed Insights, GTmetrix, and Pingdom Tools

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mobile Devices

WebPagetest, GTmetrix, and PageSpeed Insights

 

Location Dependent

WebPagetest, GTmetrix, and Pingdom Tools

 

Advanced Options

WebPagetest and GTmetrix

 

Pingdom defaults to Onload Time only

This is why you may see Pingdom results loading faster than GTmetrix and/or WebPagetest.

Silver
for The Personal Planner
$14.95
Month
Gold
for The Entrepreneur
$21.95
Annually

 

 

Fully Loaded Time vs Onload Time

Fully Loaded Time

The point after the Onload event fires and there has been no network activity for 2 seconds. This ensures more consistency with tests.

Possible issues with using this event: This event fires only when a page completely stops loading content, including ads and below the fold elements. Your site might have loaded fast above the fold and be usable, however since the analysis is now waiting for the entire site to stop loading data, your reported Page Load Time might be longer.

 

Onload Time

When the processing of the page is complete and all the resources on the page (images, CSS, etc.) have finished downloading. The browser will trigger window.onload when this occurs.

Issues with using this event: Some elements of the page load may not make it in before this event fires – like JavaScript based image carousels – causing inconsistent page load times and inaccurate screenshots. It may also report faster page load times than actual.

Conclusion

Onload time may misrepresent the true load time

Due to network variances or the way the page was designed to load (eg. asynchronous loading), resources loaded after the browser triggered window.Onload may not make it into reports.

The result is a report that indicates the page loaded faster than it actually did. This means that the while the tool received a “page finished loading” trigger at onload, the actual user is still experiencing resources being downloaded.

Our preferred testing platform, GTmetrix now uses fully loaded time, which waits for 2 seconds of network inactivity before stopping the test.

 

The Other Platforms

GTmetrix and WebPagetest allow you to switch between Fully Loaded and Onload Time.

Pingdom defaults to Onload Time only.

This is why you may see Pingdom results loading faster than GTmetrix and/or WebPagetest.

 

 

Scores and Recommendations

Recommendations will differ between tools

Each of these tools assess websites against their own set of recommendations.

Most of them stem from Google’s original open source PageSpeed library, and have likely been customized or modified.

GTmetrix in particular has modified PageSpeed and YSlow rules to assess websites based on what they feel are the most important metrics.

Conclusion

Don’t compare these tools equally and wonder why your scores differ from tool to tool

While they’re all likely based on the original, open-sourced Google PageSpeed library, some key differences should be pointed out.

After Google made general scoring algorithm/recommendation changes years ago, they have not updated the open-sourced library since.

The PageSpeed Insights online tool as a whole seems to contain a new set of rules (which isn’t open-source).

Don’t compare these tools equally and wonder why your scores differ from tool to tool; they all use different recommendation sets.

This is why you’ll see differing rules from each service, and why GTMextrix deemed it necessary to update their own PageSpeed rule set.

 

 

WP Level II + DAMS
Web Hosting with Digital Asset Management Suite
$94.90
Month
WP Level III + DAMS
Web Hosting with Digital Asset Management Suite
$134.90
Month

Silver + DAMS
Web Hosting with Digital Asset Management Suite
$29.95
Month
Gold + DAMS
Web Hosting with Digital Asset Management Suite
$45.95
Month